|
"It
looks like a rubber wax work!"
Rolling Stone © Jill Greenberg 2006 |
|
We
were surprised to see you in Rolling Stone last month.
Not only because it was 18 months too late, but there wasnt even
a mention on the cover! You wouldnt
have known it was in there. Very strange.
I frankly find it pathetic that it took them so long to
print an article thats already out of date. Thats a long
time to spend on a hatchet job, they must have really been struggling
to find flaws. And secondly the article was about
us not going to the Hall of Fame yet it isnt!
They had promised
us the front cover at the time, thats why we did it. I wouldnt have
bothered with them otherwise. I had talked with Anita Camarata Steve
and Pauls management beforehand, and she assured me it was
not going to be another poison pen piece. I presume thats what they told
her. Which is why Rolling Stone hired a writer, but
the end result was more of the same. Thank you. Never trust a Hippie.
We said it a long time ago and its not really changed. And these are hippies with laptops.
They even misunderstood that part!
Rolling Stone is the complete dogs bollocks of establishment but
it likes to pretend its very lefty and trendy. Which it isnt.
Its
as bourgeois as ever. It really is pompous. Its Clintons
Saxophone! (laughs) Its written for a smug kind of in-crowd. Its
for like Hippies I suppose from that generation; that have grown up into
corporate lawyers. And this is the kind of way they like to read about
their music. I think though, they especially picked us out for a slamming.
Which to my mind shows an undercurrent of affection for the Rock and
Roll Hall of Fame; rather than the band. Its
more celebrating the museum than the actual artifact.
They practically ignored the Hall of Fame and tried to turn it into a piece
about the 30th anniversary of Never Mind The Bollocks.
Why going to the bother of doing that? Why not just bury it, you know?
Theres a weird underlying tone to the whole article that they dont
believe a word you say.
You dont have to. You do not have to believe anything I
say, but what you do have to do in this world is have a serious look
at how things are; and then come back to me. All Ive ever done, my whole life, is try
to get a thing right, to explain why I do what I do, and if that makes me a liar,
well, I do not understand. I can not comprehend what your motivation would be.
Its like this, me on my own life is only my opinion. According
to them. Right? They are talking to the experts on me, and you
cant
get round that kind of stupidity.
Its ironic that a publication like that can call you a font of
misinformation but in the same issue proclaim Marilyn Manson to be the
Antichrist! It literally mentions Antichrist and Anarchist next to each other.
No shame!
You have to take with a pinch of salt whatever these people put up, because
if they put him up as that, you know, (laughs), how can they possibly
be finding flaws in us!
They had a LONG time to edit this, and if Im a minefield, or whatever it
is, of misinformation, well prove that. Dont just say it, and then
misquote natural born liars shall we say, as better references. I state there
quite clearly, If you want to know about the Sex Pistols then ask the Sex
Pistols! Anything else is irrelevant. Malcolm was not a Sex Pistol. And
as for me wishing him dead on some British TV; Id like to know where that
comes from?
If youre going to be quoting Malcolm from other articles and misplacing
them in rather undignified places for some kind of assumption of
truth well, youre off on the wrong track. I think the
writer has juxtapositioned us in places. He never grasps exactly what the bottom
line of the thing is at all; and seems to ignore the music.
If you think our songs are average and whatever. That's fine. Youre welcome
to your opinion. But entire governments thought different! And we were in very
dangerous positions because of these songs. They dont understand the hardship,
and frankly, the terror weve had to go through over the years in
order to back up what we initially started. And to make light of that like
it doesnt count for nothing is just stupid. Because its
a brave man indeed that stands up against such forces. And if that be self praise
then Yeah! Here comes the self-praise. I did it. You didnt. Fuck
off. Right? Plain and simple. Its very easy to bitch after the trumpet
player has blown his horn, but you didnt blow first so fuck off! (laughs)
Again, the powers that be, theyd rather take the Malcolm line than
any other line because that way easily explains us away. All these kind
of people have their situation well and truly pocketed. Anything that
rocks their boat has to be taken down a peg or two. Its pathetic
and its spiteful.
But its nothing to scream about. Weve
had worse done. So no sweat, but you know, what a load of Bollocks! (laughs)
|
Bunch
of Cowboys? Jimmy Kimmel Live,
March 10th 2006 © Courtesy
ABC |
|
He even accuses you of lying that the Sex Pistols came from Music Hall.
Hows that a lie? How is that a lie? Its a resentment of our
culture it really is. We bridged many, many gaps between working class
and middle class and made the world a slightly better place; and definitely
opened the doors for many, many new bands. And he seems to resent that.
The article, really, was put together with an attitude that was negative
right from the start. And its deliberately trying to make, or substantiate,
some kind of rift between me and Steve. Of which there is none.
One of my biggest enemies is other people perceiving how we are with
each other. Now, if I approach Malcolm and go Get me a beer cunt, and he says Fuck
off thats just the way we are with each other! That is not a bitter
thing. That is light-hearted. Thats people being people, as everyone in
the British Isles should know, and do hear. Its an open friendly
chirpy way of communicating. This writer has no understanding of British
humour, or European humour, or how the world actually works, and what
class distinctions create.
Some of it is absolutely ridiculous, saying things like the Ramones
were conceptually
more perfect than the Pistols. What sort of angle is that?
Oh well, thats kind of missing the point isnt it! Hello, were
not manufactured pop units. Many, many bands are and America definitely likes
to create these manufactured pop units Marilyn Manson comes
to mind, and definitely Green Day. They are manufactured and manoeuvred into
market places to sell. Its all about the Dollar. The bottom line is the
Dollar bill. Well, thats all well and fine and I have no qualms about those
kind of people in the world, but I do when they try to juxtaposition us up against
them, and claim somehow that were less for not being as corrupt
as that.
Its a niggley arse way of trying to deny just how fucking good
we are! And this is from the so-called intelligentsia. Yet again missing the
point because they are over elaborating on their own presumptions.
You can not presume what the truth is. The truth is there for all to
see. I wrote the songs, I sang them, and I did my job well. There it
is. Beyond that I havent
asked for much and I certainly havent been asking for awards. And
in fact, I quite happily turn many down.
It struck me that they wouldnt have used the same dismissive tone in
an article about anyone other than the Sex Pistols. Like its
fair game just because it is the Sex Pistols.
Yeah, I know. In a way its a compliment that they spend so much time dismissing
a few things; right? Now, I talked to this man for a good two hours, shall we
say, and if thats all you can come up with; you know? I approached it in
a very friendly, open minded way as I usually do and
Im sneered at for that. Well, thats really unfortunate, that you
cant meet someone on a man-to-man basis and be yourself without
being suspected of something.
And this consistent suspicion, well, in a weird way, they probably have
a right to be suspicious, because Im far smarter than them (laughs). And that does
frighten them. Just speaking of myself personally, Im one person who they
can not manipulate or co-opt into this industry. The industry is wrong. Not me.
It is utterly and completely corrupt. And magazines like this absolutely toe
that line. And really, if you want to remain ignorant then Rolling Stone is
the magazine of choice. Because you will be ignorant.
It completely lacks passion and love of music. You just dont detect anything
in it that makes you think anything other than Oh thats a nice aftershave
advert. I think in a weird way Rolling Stone are right, were
not as an accoutrement to your Land Rover and your aftershave; alright! So were
not the band for you boys of Rolling Stone! Theyre just another
institution that sooner or later is gonna topple. You cant live
on hot-air and farty wind like that for very long.
They seem to have made a career out of it
so far. Its virtually
impossible to read anyway
I dont know who reads it. I know its presumed to be some
kind of an institution, but hello, like we know with all institutions,
they have to be have
to be torn down and started all over again! Its
part of the shitsdem and its where everything is going wrong. The
smugness of the magazine is killing everything thats fun in music.
Keep up the good work Rolling
Stone it proves you are the enemy; you are the en-em-ee.
And apart from anything else, what was the weird bloody wedding
photo nonsense! What is the high-art going on in that! (laughs) My brother
blew it up, and Im gonna put it in a frame! (laughs) It looks so,
so weird!
Its so strange! It looks like theyve gone into some old computer
program to try buff it up. I mean, Im always saying as a laugh
to photographers, Can
you airbrush out my wrinkles! This lot took it serious! And added
a few of their own!
I think it was a hose-pipe they used rather than an airbrush!
It looks like a rubber wax work! |